Where can you get lasix

The Models of Coordination and Technical Assistance to Achieve Outcomes in Communities project sought to better where can you get lasix understand the gaps in knowledge about what works in training and TA—what forms of it are effective and under what circumstances, who it can help, and how to improve its effectiveness. To inform the field, ASPE and Mathematica conducted a literature review, convened over 30 training and TA stakeholders (technical experts), and surveyed members of an internal HHS group focused on sharing training and TA practices about topics of interest. This learning agenda suggests ways in which training and TA stakeholders might further explore these topics.Technical AppendixMany stakeholders value and use training and technical assistance (TA) to plan for change and to develop innovative solutions to both long-standing and newly emerging problems. Training and TA is commonly defined as the transfer of knowledge, expertise, and skills to people, where can you get lasix organizations, and communities.

It can reveal gaps in services or a need for new or different services. Federal, state, and local governments can provide training and TA to meet their policy objectives or to help people or organizations comply with program rules or adopt best practices. Grantmakers can require or encourage participation where can you get lasix in training and TA as part of a grant, and organizations may provide it or seek it out to fulfill their missions. Whatever the reason, it is critical for providers to clearly understand why someone is using training and TA so that they can design it to meet recipients’ needs.

This brief shares examples of training and TA in the context of cross-sector collaboration, which was an initial focus of the study..

Lasix im

	Lasix	Lozol sr	Benicar hct	Trandate
Does work at first time	At walgreens	Order online	Order online	Online Drugstore
Where to get	40mg 90 tablet $49.95	$	20mg + 12.5mg 60 tablet $110.40	100mg 30 tablet $54.99
Side effects	100mg	Consultation	Ask your Doctor	100mg
Buy with mastercard	Order	Order online	Order in Pharmacy	Purchase online

October is Mental Health Awareness Month lasix im and World Mental Health Day takes place on 10 October 2020. This year, the hypertension medications lasix has added a new dimension to concerns regarding mental health in our communities. Across the globe stories continue to emerge of people’s experiences of anxiety, fear and depression due to the uncertainty and stress lasix im brought on by the lasix.1–3 Job losses, financial and housing insecurity, the challenges of working from home, home schooling, restricted access to health and social care services and social isolation coupled with reduced support and contact with family and friends have all impacted people’s well-being. There is particular concern about the mental health of healthcare workers during this difficult time.While most healthcare workers are resilient to the long-term effects of this period of stress and anxiety, there is the added worry about scarce resources, lack of cure or effective treatment options, isolation from family, coping with patient suffering and deaths and the moral and ethical impact of decisions as to who will receive acute care.

These factors have significant potential for negative repercussions on the mental health and well-being of healthcare staff.4 5 There have been reports of high levels of stress, depression and even suicides,6 and long-term effects include a higher risk for post-traumatic stress disorder or moral injury.5Healthcare organisations need to plan for the inevitable consequence of this lasix and ensure that resources are in place for lasix im their workers. Screening for mental health issues and treatment, including counselling, should be made available. In addition, nurses and other healthcare staff should be encouraged to lasix im reflect on their experiences and consider how to implement self-care strategies that will enhance their well-being. This includes staying informed of the current data and information and being aware of the risks to themselves and others while caring for patients with the lasix.

By monitoring and enacting strategies to reduce stress and develop support systems, staff can minimise longer-term impacts.4Whether organisational support and self-care monitoring have achieved better mental health outcomes for healthcare workers is, as yet, unknown. Research across the globe is underway not only related to the lasix itself but also to the mental health consequences of lasix im the lasix. We do not yet know the extent of the issues or how best to support healthcare providers. In order to better understand the issues and to support nurses at this time, evidence-based nursing will focus our social media to mental health lasix im issues during the month of October.

We will highlight and share relevant resources and information and encourage discussion of the key challenges facing healthcare workers.During October, we will showcase the experiences of four key groups—patients, nurses, students and informal carers and families. Be sure to log into evidence-based nursing lasix im each week for the following blogs:October 4. Impact of hypertension medications on patient mental health.October 11. Impact of lasix im hypertension medications on nurses’ mental health and.Twitter Chat on Wednesday October 14 at 20:00 UK time.Oct.

18. Impact of hypertension medications on student nursing.Oct. 25. Impact of hypertension medications on informal carers and families.A PhD is a globally recognised postgraduate degree and typically the highest degree programme awarded by a University, with students usually required to expand the boundaries of knowledge by undertaking original research.

The purpose of PhD programmes of study is to nurture, support and facilitate doctoral students to undertake independent research to expected academic and research standards, culminating in a substantial thesis and examined by viva voce. In this paper—the first of two linked Research Made Simple articles—we explore what the foundations of a high-quality PhD are, and how a Doctoral candidate can develop a study which is successful, original and impactful.Foundations of a ‘good’ PhD studySupervision and supportCentral to the development and completion of a good PhD is the supervisory relationship between the student and supervisor. The supervisor guides the student by directing them to resources and training to ensure continuous learning, provides opportunity to engage with experts in the field, and facilitates the development of critical thinking through questioning and providing constructive criticism.1The support needs of students will be different, so a flexible yet quality assured approach to PhD research training is required. A good supervisory team (usually includes at least two postdoctoral academics) provide experienced guidance and mentorship and will offer students academic support, with regular meetings and timely feedback on written submissions, will assist the student to develop a peer network and help them access research communities relative to their field.

Effective supervision has beneficial outcomes for students, including encouraging a positive work ethic and influencing engagement in a stimulating environment, allowing students to pursue their own ideas with educated encouragement. The quality of the supervisory relationship can impact greatly on the PhD experience and ultimately sets the student on the road to producing excellent Doctoral work.1An environment that promotes personal and professional development is further aided by positive peer interactions. If students feel part of a community and have contact with others also working on doctoral studies, there is the scope for peer compassion and understanding during both challenging and rewarding periods. Students who access personal and professional support and guidance through mentoring models during their studies are more likely to succeed.

These models include one-to-one peer mentoring or activities for example journal discussion or methods learning groups. Often, groups of students naturally come together and give each other support and advice about research process expectations and challenges, and offer friendship, and guidance.2 Given the usefulness of different types of mentoring models, all can create a supportive and collaborative environment within a PhD programme of study, to minimise working in isolation and enable students to achieve their greatest potential.Characteristics of a good study. Originality and theoretical underpinningA PhD should make an original contribution to knowledge. Originality can be achieved through the study design, the nature or outcomes of the knowledge synthesis, or the implications for research and/or practice.3 Disciplinary variation, however, influences the assessment of originality.

For example, originality in science, technology, engineering and mathematics subjects is often inferred if the work is published/publishable, in comparison to intellectual originality in the social sciences.4 Although PhD originality assumes different nuances in different contexts, there is a general acceptance across disciplines that there should be evidence of the following within the thesis:An interplay between old and new—any claims of originality are developed from existing knowledge and practices.There are degrees of originality, relating to more than one aspect of the thesis.Any claims for originality are accompanied by clear articulation of significance.A good PhD should be also underpinned by theoretical and/or conceptual frameworks (that include philosophical and methodological models) that give clarity to the approach, structure and vision of the study.5 These theoretical and conceptual frameworks can explain why the study is pertinent and how the research addresses gaps in the literature.6 Table 1 provides a distinction of what construes theoretical and conceptual frameworks.View this table:Table 1 Characteristics of theoretical and conceptual frameworks7Theoretical/conceptual frameworks must align with the research question/aims, and the student must be able to articulate how conceptual/theoretical framework were chosen. Key points for consideration include:Are the research questions/aim and objectives well defined?. What theory/theories/concepts are being operationalised?. How are the theories/concepts related?.

Are the ontological and epistemological perspectives clearly conveyed and how do they relate to theories and concepts outlined?. What are the potential benefits and limitations of the theories and concepts outlined?. Are the ways the theories/concepts are outlined and being used original?. A PhD thesis (and demonstrable in viva) must be able to offer cohesion between the choice of research methods that stems from the conceptual/theoretical framework, the related ontological and epistemological decisions, the theoretical perspective and the chosen methodology (table 2).

PhD students must be able to articulate the methodological decisions made and be critical of methods employed to answer their research questions.View this table:Table 2 Relationship between research paradigms, perspectives, methodologies and methods.8 9ConclusionIn summary, we offer considerations of what the foundations of a good PhD should be. We have considered some of the key ingredients of quality PhD supervision, support and research processes and explored how these will contribute to the development of a study that leads to student success and which makes a valuable contribution to the evidence base. In the next paper, we will look in more detail at the assessment of the PhD through the submission of a thesis and an oral viva..

October is where can you get lasix Mental Health Awareness Month and World Mental Health Day takes place on 10 my review here October 2020. This year, the hypertension medications lasix has added a new dimension to concerns regarding mental health in our communities. Across the globe where can you get lasix stories continue to emerge of people’s experiences of anxiety, fear and depression due to the uncertainty and stress brought on by the lasix.1–3 Job losses, financial and housing insecurity, the challenges of working from home, home schooling, restricted access to health and social care services and social isolation coupled with reduced support and contact with family and friends have all impacted people’s well-being. There is particular concern about the mental health of healthcare workers during this difficult time.While most healthcare workers are resilient to the long-term effects of this period of stress and anxiety, there is the added worry about scarce resources, lack of cure or effective treatment options, isolation from family, coping with patient suffering and deaths and the moral and ethical impact of decisions as to who will receive acute care.

These factors have significant potential for negative repercussions on the mental health and well-being of healthcare staff.4 5 There have been reports of high levels where can you get lasix of stress, depression and even suicides,6 and long-term effects include a higher risk for post-traumatic stress disorder or moral injury.5Healthcare organisations need to plan for the inevitable consequence of this lasix and ensure that resources are in place for their workers. Screening for mental health issues and treatment, including counselling, should be made available. In addition, nurses and other healthcare staff should be encouraged to reflect on their experiences and consider how to implement where can you get lasix self-care strategies that will enhance their well-being. This includes staying informed of the current data and information and being aware of the risks to themselves and others while caring for patients with the lasix.

By monitoring and enacting strategies to reduce stress and develop support systems, staff can minimise longer-term impacts.4Whether organisational support and self-care monitoring have achieved better mental health outcomes for healthcare workers is, as yet, unknown. Research across the globe is underway not only related to the lasix itself but also to the mental health consequences where can you get lasix of the lasix. We do not yet know the extent of the issues or how best to support healthcare providers. In order to better understand the issues and to support nurses at this time, evidence-based nursing will focus where can you get lasix our social media to mental health issues during the month of October.

We will highlight and share relevant resources and information and encourage discussion of the key challenges facing healthcare workers.During October, we will showcase the experiences of four key groups—patients, nurses, students and informal carers and families. Be sure to log where can you get lasix into evidence-based nursing each week for the following blogs:October 4. Impact of hypertension medications on patient mental health.October 11. Impact of where can you get lasix hypertension medications on nurses’ mental health and.Twitter Chat on Wednesday October 14 at 20:00 UK time.Oct.

18. Impact of hypertension medications on student nursing.Oct. 25. Impact of hypertension medications on informal carers and families.A PhD is a globally recognised postgraduate degree and typically the highest degree programme awarded by a University, with students usually required to expand the boundaries of knowledge by undertaking original research.

The purpose of PhD programmes of study is to nurture, support and facilitate doctoral students to undertake independent research to expected academic and research standards, culminating in a substantial thesis and examined by viva voce. In this paper—the first of two linked Research Made Simple articles—we explore what the foundations of a high-quality PhD are, and how a Doctoral candidate can develop a study which is successful, original and impactful.Foundations of a ‘good’ PhD studySupervision and supportCentral to the development and completion of a good PhD is the supervisory relationship between the student and supervisor. The supervisor guides the student by directing them to resources and training to ensure continuous learning, provides opportunity to engage with experts in the field, and facilitates the development of critical thinking through questioning and providing constructive criticism.1The support needs of students will be different, so a flexible yet quality assured approach to PhD research training is required. A good supervisory team (usually includes at least two postdoctoral academics) provide experienced guidance and mentorship and will offer students academic support, with regular meetings and timely feedback on written submissions, will assist the student to develop a peer network and help them access research communities relative to their field.

Effective supervision has beneficial outcomes for students, including encouraging a positive work ethic and influencing engagement in a stimulating environment, allowing students to pursue their own ideas with educated encouragement. The quality of the supervisory relationship can impact greatly on the PhD experience and ultimately sets the student on the road to producing excellent Doctoral work.1An environment that promotes personal and professional development is further aided by positive peer interactions. If students feel part of a community and have contact with others also working on doctoral studies, there is the scope for peer compassion and understanding during both challenging and rewarding periods. Students who access personal and professional support and guidance through mentoring models during their studies are more likely to succeed.

These models include one-to-one peer mentoring or activities for example journal discussion or methods learning groups. Often, groups of students naturally come together and give each other support and advice about research process expectations and challenges, and offer friendship, and guidance.2 Given the usefulness of different types of mentoring models, all can create a supportive and collaborative environment within a PhD programme of study, to minimise working in isolation and enable students to achieve their greatest potential.Characteristics of a good study. Originality and theoretical underpinningA PhD should make an original contribution to knowledge. Originality can be achieved through the study design, the nature or outcomes of the knowledge synthesis, or the implications for research and/or practice.3 Disciplinary variation, however, influences the assessment of originality.

For example, originality in science, technology, engineering and mathematics subjects is often inferred if the work is published/publishable, in comparison to intellectual originality in the social sciences.4 Although PhD originality assumes different nuances in different contexts, there is a general acceptance across disciplines that there should be evidence of the following within the thesis:An interplay between old and new—any claims of originality are developed from existing knowledge and practices.There are degrees of originality, relating to more than one aspect of the thesis.Any claims for originality are accompanied by clear articulation of significance.A good PhD should be also underpinned by theoretical and/or conceptual frameworks (that include philosophical and methodological models) that give clarity to the approach, structure and vision of the study.5 These theoretical and conceptual frameworks can explain why the study is pertinent and how the research addresses gaps in the literature.6 Table 1 provides a distinction of what construes theoretical and conceptual frameworks.View this table:Table 1 Characteristics of theoretical and conceptual frameworks7Theoretical/conceptual frameworks must align with the research question/aims, and the student must be able to articulate how conceptual/theoretical framework were chosen. Key points for consideration include:Are the research questions/aim and objectives well defined?. What theory/theories/concepts are being operationalised?. How are the theories/concepts related?.

Are the ontological and epistemological perspectives clearly conveyed and how do they relate to theories and concepts outlined?. What are the potential benefits and limitations of the theories and concepts outlined?. Are the ways the theories/concepts are outlined and being used original?. A PhD thesis (and demonstrable in viva) must be able to offer cohesion between the choice of research methods that stems from the conceptual/theoretical framework, the related ontological and epistemological decisions, the theoretical perspective and the chosen methodology (table 2).

PhD students must be able to articulate the methodological decisions made and be critical of methods employed to answer their research questions.View this table:Table 2 Relationship between research paradigms, perspectives, methodologies and methods.8 9ConclusionIn summary, we offer considerations of what the foundations of a good PhD should be. We have considered some of the key ingredients of quality PhD supervision, support and research processes and explored how these will contribute to the development of a study that leads to student success and which makes a valuable contribution to the evidence base. In the next paper, we will look in more detail at the assessment of the PhD through the submission of a thesis and an oral viva..

What is Lasix?

FUROSEMIDE is a diuretic. It helps you make more urine and to lose salt and excess water from your body. Lasix is used to treat high blood pressure, and edema or swelling from heart, kidney or liver disease.

Can lasix cause leg cramps

20.Last week, there were less than 10,000 active cases under investigation.More than 1.64 million hypertension medications tests have been administered in Westchester since a knockout post the beginning of the lasix, resulting in a total of 85,723 positive cases for a 5.2 percent rate can lasix cause leg cramps that has been on the rise for weeks.The overall positive rate in the Hudson Valley has been on the rise for the past five days, though the seven-day rolling average in the region dipped from 7.5 percent to 7.0 percent and the 14-day average dropped from 7.7 percent to 7.5 percent:Friday, Jan. 15. 6.5 percent;Saturday, Jan. 16. 6.3 percent;Sunday, Jan.

17. 6.8 percent;Monday, Jan. 18. 7.4 percent;Tuesday, Jan. 19.

7.7 percent.In the mid-Hudson Valley region, there are currently 1,107 hypertension medications patients hospitalized, representing 0.05 percent of the population, leaving less than 40 percent of hospital beds still available.New hypertension medications-related deaths have brought the total in Westchester to 1,974 as the county approaches 2,000 fatalities.Port Chester remains the county’s only “orange” hotspot, while New Rochelle, Ossining, Peekskill, Port Chester, Tarrytown, and Yonkers remain designed “yellow zones.”The number of active hypertension medications cases in Westchester, by municipality, according to the Department of Health on, Wednesday, Jan. 20:Yonkers. 2,828;New Rochelle. 936;Mount Vernon. 781;White Plains.

608;Ossining Village. 466;Greenburgh. 454;Yorktown. 453;Port Chester. 423;Cortlandt.

421;Peekskill. 418;Mamaroneck Village. 253;Harrison. 244;Mount Pleasant. 223;Somers.

214;Eastchester. 210;Tarrytown. 194;Sleepy Hollow. 181;Rye City. 153;Bedford.

163;New Castle. 139;Mount Kisco. 120;Mamaroneck Town. 117;Rye Brook. 99;North Castle.

99;Dobbs Ferry. 98;Scarsdale. 90;Tuckahoe. 83;Pleasantville. 75;Briarcliff Manor.

71;Hastings-on-Hudson. 71;Pelham. 69;Croton-on-Hudson. 66;Bronxville. 65;Lewisboro.

64;Elmsford. 59;Larchmont. 53;Pelham Manor. 52;North Salem. 52;Ossining Town.

6.3 percent;Sunday, How can i get viagra Jan where can you get lasix. 17. 6.8 percent;Monday, Jan.

7.7 percent.In the mid-Hudson Valley region, there are currently 1,107 hypertension medications patients hospitalized, representing 0.05 percent of the population, leaving less than 40 percent of hospital beds still available.New hypertension medications-related deaths have brought the total in Westchester to 1,974 as the county approaches 2,000 fatalities.Port Chester remains the county’s only “orange” hotspot, while New Rochelle, Ossining, Peekskill, Port Chester, Tarrytown, and Yonkers remain designed “yellow zones.”The number of active hypertension medications cases in Westchester, by municipality, according to the Department of Health on, Wednesday, Jan. 20:Yonkers. 2,828;New Rochelle.

936;Mount Vernon. 781;White Plains. 608;Ossining Village.

466;Greenburgh. 454;Yorktown. 453;Port Chester.

423;Cortlandt. 421;Peekskill. 418;Mamaroneck Village.

253;Harrison. 244;Mount Pleasant. 223;Somers.

214;Eastchester. 210;Tarrytown. 194;Sleepy Hollow.

139;Mount Kisco. 120;Mamaroneck Town. 117;Rye Brook.

99;North Castle. 99;Dobbs Ferry. 98;Scarsdale.

90;Tuckahoe. 83;Pleasantville. 75;Briarcliff Manor.

71;Hastings-on-Hudson. 71;Pelham. 69;Croton-on-Hudson.

59;Larchmont. 53;Pelham Manor. 52;North Salem.

52;Ossining Town. 47;Irvington. 47;Buchanan.

44;Ardsley. 41;Pound Ridge. 28.There were 195,409 hypertension medications tests administered in New York on Jan.

20, according to Cuomo, resulting in 13,364 positive cases for a 6.84 percent positive rate, down dramatically from last week.There are now 9,273 hypertension medications patients hospitalized across the state, up 37, while more than 1,600 are in ICU and 1,044 are intubated with the lasix.

What is lasix used to treat

Diagnostic errors in hospital medicine have mostly remained in uncharted waters.1 This is what is lasix used to treat partly because several factors make measurement of http://www.ec-prot-goxwiller.ac-strasbourg.fr/?page_id=4876 diagnostic errors challenging. Patients are often admitted to hospitals with a tentative diagnosis and what is lasix used to treat need additional diagnostic investigations to determine next steps. This evolving nature of a diagnosis makes it hard to determine when the correct diagnosis could have been established and if a more specific diagnosis was needed to start the right treatment.2 Hospitalised patients also may have diagnoses that are atypical or rare and pose dilemmas for treating clinicians. As a result, delays in diagnosis may not necessarily be what is lasix used to treat related to a diagnostic error. Furthermore, what types of diagnostic errors occur in the hospital and their prevalence depends on how one defines what is lasix used to treat them.

Different approaches to define them have included counting missed, wrong or delayed diagnoses regardless of whether there was a process error;3 counting them only when there was a clear ‘missed opportunity’ – ie, something different could have been done to make the correct or timely diagnosis;4 or diagnostic adverse events (ie, diagnostic errors resulting in harm);5 all leading to views of the problem through different lenses.Two articles in this issue of the journal provide new insights into the epidemiology of diagnostic errors in hospitalised patients.6 7 Gunderson and colleagues conducted a systematic review to determine the prevalence of harmful diagnostic errors in hospitalised patients.6 Raffel and colleagues studied readmitted patients using established methods for diagnostic error detection and analysis to gain insights into contributing factors.7 Both studies advance the science of measurement and understanding of how to reduce diagnostic error in hospitals. We discuss the significance of the results for hospital medicine and implications for emerging research and practice improvement efforts.Finding diagnostic errors in hospitalsGunderson and colleagues performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to inform a new estimate for the prevalence of diagnostic adverse events among hospitalised patients, a what is lasix used to treat rate of 0.7%.6 Their review shows how diagnostic error is a global problem, with studies from countries across five continents. The prevalence however is lower than what might be expected looking at previous research, mostly in outpatient care, and based on expert estimates.8–11 The prevalence of diagnostic error in hospital care may be lower because outpatient care, especially primary care, has the challenging task of identifying patients with a serious disease from a large sample of patients who present with common symptoms and mostly benign non-urgent diseases. A higher state of attention in the hospital and higher prior probability of a patient having a what is lasix used to treat more serious disease may also reduce the likelihood of something being missed (ie, the prevalence effect).12 13 Furthermore, the hospital setting offers more diagnostic evaluation possibilities (consultations, imaging, laboratory) and more members of the diagnostic team to alert a clinician on the wrong diagnostic track.The heterogeneity of the studies in the review and meta-analysis and a broad scope may also explain the lower prevalence rate.6 14 The included studies did not have an exclusive focus on detecting diagnostic errors but rather aimed to identify all types of adverse events, including medication and surgical adverse events,5 15 which are relatively easier to measure. Consequently, the what is lasix used to treat data collection instruments were likely not sufficiently sensitive to pick up diagnostic adverse events, resulting in an underestimation.

Some diagnostic adverse events may also be classified as ‘other’ types. For instance delayed diagnosis of a wound leakage after surgery is often considered a surgical complication and not categorised as a delay in diagnosis.16 Studies in the review also detected adverse events (ie, errors that resulted what is lasix used to treat in harm)6 which is a subgroup of diagnostic errors, because not every diagnostic error results in harm.17 Lastly, while the random selection of patients is a strength for determining prevalence of medical error, not all admissions involve making a diagnosis—patients are often hospitalised for treatment and procedures. As the literature in the area becomes more robust, future reviews may be able to provide an updated estimate. For now, Gunderson and colleagues estimate 250,000 diagnostic adverse events occur annually in the USA, which should be alarming enough to warrant what is lasix used to treat attention and intervention.While the study by Raffel and colleagues is not a true prevalence study (it only evaluated 7-day readmissions), it uses dedicated tools to identify diagnostic error in hospitals, a crucial next step. By examining a subset of hospital what is lasix used to treat admissions at greater risk of diagnosis-related problems (ie, readmissions within 7 days after hospital discharge) and by using tools dedicated to identifying diagnostic error, the investigators were able to describe error types and contributing factors.

The advantage of studying such a high-risk sample is that diagnostic errors can be found more efficiently, that is, the positive predictive value is higher than if you review all consecutive patients. This could what is lasix used to treat identify a higher number of cases to identify contributing factors. While the positive predictive value they achieved through this method was still rather low, methods to selectively identify diagnostic errors are valuable in measurement efforts. Future studies could build on this work to develop sampling methods with higher predictive values that can be used by others for research and practice improvement.Diseases at risk for diagnostic error in the hospital settingTypes of conditions what is lasix used to treat involved in diagnostic error in both studies reflect a broad range of diseases commonly identified in previous studies, such as malignancies, pulmonary embolism, aortic aneurysm and s.5 8 18 A recent malpractice claims-based study has led some to suggest that initial diagnostic error reduction efforts, including allocation of funding for research and quality measurement/improvement, should focus on three broad types of disease categories, the so-called ‘Big Three’, namely cancer, s and cardiovascular diseases, because they are highly prevalent and result in significant harm.11 19 20 These three disease categories cover a large portion of diagnoses made in medicine. Indeed, data beyond claims also suggest that diagnostic errors in each of these categories are common.5 18 However, diagnostic errors span a large range of other diseases what is lasix used to treat as shown in both studies, which is similar to what prior studies have found.

For instance, in one primary care study, 68 unique diagnoses were missed with the most common condition accounting for only 6.7% of errors.21Contributing factors in hospital medicineRaffel and colleagues applied established tools (ie, SAFER Dx22 and DEER23) to identify contributing factors. They found that what is lasix used to treat most of these involved failures in clinical assessment and/or testing. Contributing factors in these two domains occurred in more than 90% of diagnostic errors, a high proportion consistent with previous work.8 17 18 Furthermore, these main contributing factors are common across diagnostic errors regardless what is lasix used to treat of the diseases involved. For instance, similar process breakdowns emerge across different types of missed cancer diagnoses.24–26Finding ‘Forests’ not just the ‘Big Trees’ to enable scientific progressSo should initial scientific efforts just target disease categories?. And if so, what is lasix used to treat should they address just the ‘Big Three’?.

Data from prior studies across different settings, including those from Gunderson and Raffel and colleagues, find large diversity in misdiagnosed diseases.5–7 18 21 27 This suggests that an exclusive focus on the ‘Big Three’ would neglect a substantial proportion of other common and harmful diagnostic errors.27 Furthermore, research on contributing factors of diagnostic errors reveals a number of common system and process factors that would require robust disease-agnostic approaches. If funding and advocacy for diagnostic safety becomes mostly disease oriented, it will pull resources away from broader ‘disease-agnostic’ research and quality improvement efforts needed to understand and address these underlying system and process factors.28 Biomedical research is already quite disease focused and supported by many disease-specific institutes and this now needs to be balanced by work that catalyses much-needed foundational and cross-cutting healthcare delivery system improvements.We would thus recommend a balanced strategy that carefully combines disease-specific and disease-agnostic approaches to help address common contributing factors, system issues and process breakdowns for diagnostic error that cut across these many what is lasix used to treat unique diseases. For example, if new quality measures to quantify delays in colorectal cancer what is lasix used to treat diagnosis and missed diagnosis of sepsis are developed, we would also need ‘disease-agnostic’ studies that evaluate the implementation and effectiveness of such measures. This includes how they fit within current measurement programmes, what their measurement burden is and what the unintended consequences may be. A combined approach would create more synergistic and collaborative understanding in addition to enabling application of common frameworks over at this website and approaches to multiple conditions, rather than ‘reinventing the wheel’ for what is lasix used to treat each disease or disease category.

This type of approach may have a larger population-based impact and help us see the entire ‘forest’ to reduce diagnostic error.Implications for practice improvementA crucial first step for improving diagnosis in hospitals is to create programmes to identify and analyse diagnostic errors.29 Most hospitals have systems and programmes in place to report and analyse safety issues such as falls, surgical complications and medication errors, but they do not capture diagnostic errors. With increased recognition of risks for diagnostic error, hospitals should use recent guidance, such as from the US Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, and consider pragmatic measurement approaches to start identifying and learning from diagnostic errors.30To reduce cognitive errors, ‘cognitive debiasing strategies’ have been widely recommended.31 However, there is increasing evidence what is lasix used to treat that those strategies are not effective for diagnostic error reduction and recent insights have revealed lack of knowledge as the fundamental cause of errors in the diagnostic reasoning process.32–34 Next steps for practice improvement would therefore need to involve studying the role of knowledge and its interplay with cognitive processes. Interventions should explore opportunities to increase clinicians’ knowledge base (eg, by education and feedback) as well as testing and implementing clinical decision support systems to allow for timely access to what is lasix used to treat the relevant knowledge. While specific interventions need more development and testing, other general safety practices such as better collaboration with the laboratory and radiology departments to facilitate more accurate ordering and interpretation of the tests,33 are ready for adoption.ConclusionsTwo studies6 7 of diagnostic error in hospital medicine—by Gunderson and colleagues and Raffel and colleagues—have advanced our knowledge about its epidemiology. Consistent with what is lasix used to treat prior studies, a large range of diseases and a whole host of common contributory factors are involved.

Although the estimated prevalence of diagnostic error relies on data from prior studies conducted during an era of limited dedicated tools to identify diagnostic errors, these numbers have significant research and practice implications. Measurement science is still evolving but both studies should inspire all hospitals to apply more contemporary what is lasix used to treat methods to identify and analyse diagnostic errors for learning and improvement. Given that errors across multiple diseases in multitude of settings have many common contributing factors, disease-agnostic approaches focused on common systems and process contributory factors are likely to have significant benefit and should be emphasised in further research and development efforts.Patient advocates have long called for patients to have access to all of their healthcare data, including electronic health records (EHRs).1 In parallel, experts have suggested that providing patients with access to EHRs will improve patient engagement, care quality, and, by extension, health/healthcare outcomes.2 Prior observational what is lasix used to treat studies have supported some of these claims—for example, documenting that patients are overwhelmingly interested in and satisfied with receiving their healthcare data electronically,3 to finding that patients do identify errors when they read physician notes in the EHR.4 Because studies of EHR access for patients have been conducted and disseminated across disparate clinical conditions and settings and often using varied methodologies, the systematic review by Neves et al in this issue of BMJ Quality &. Safety provides a valuable contribution in assessing the impact of patients’ EHR access specifically within the randomised controlled trial (RCT) literature.5 Their meta-analysis demonstrates some significant but potentially limited benefits within these 20 RCTs that involved sharing EHR data/access with patients.Overall, Neves et al found a few clear trends. First, there was a consistent, modest improvement in glycaemic control in RCTs targeting patients with diabetes, reinforcing the observational research focused on portal use for diabetes care.6 In addition, patient access to EHRs seemed to support safety of care in facilitating medication adherence and identification of medication discrepancies what is lasix used to treat.

These results are similar to observational studies,7 as well as a recent scoping review of patient engagement interventions to promote the safety of care and to improve short-term and what is lasix used to treat intermediate-term clinical outcomes.8 Finally, for patient-reported outcomes ranging from self-efficacy to patient activation to patient satisfaction, results were mixed, with about half of included studies showing some improvement. Thus, this review highlighted a wide variation and potential lack of consensus about what patient-centred outcome to include in studying EHR-enabled interventions, given the diffuse set of behaviours that could be targeted. More importantly, this review highlights that none of the included studies, many of which are older, focused on equity as a primary objective of the work (and very few even included data on racial/ethnic, educational attainment, digital literacy and/or health literacy differences9 10)—even though there are known barriers to digital health interventions by these characteristics.Despite the modest benefits seen in these 20 randomised trials of EHR-facilitated complex care interventions, we still believe in the clinical what is lasix used to treat value and potential improvement in patient-reported outcomes in this space. A more careful examination of the 20 included studies in this review actually sheds important light on delivering complex interventions to improve quality of care, during which patient access to EHRs was implemented in varied ways that might have led to more muddled results. For example, many of the included studies tested evidence-based practices that are known to independently enhance the quality of care, such as patient outreach and reminders what is lasix used to treat for healthcare tasks, self-management training and increased healthcare provider communication access.

Therefore, without detailed behavioural pathways for the targeted intervention components what is lasix used to treat surrounding EHR data access, it is challenging to interpret observed trial effects. In our opinion and in our previous work,11 one-time action by systems or clinics granting patient access to EHRs is unlikely to replicate the effect of these interventions. In particular, access versus training to use EHRs what is lasix used to treat should likely be considered separately, as well as the study of specific features within the EHR. For example, passive provision of medical information from the EHR via online portals (eg, after-visit summaries or list of immunisations) differs substantially from active communication or completion of healthcare tasks via EHR-linked websites (eg, secure messaging exchanges between patients and providers about medical concerns or medication refill requests).Therefore, we hope that this review can push the field beyond RCTs of patient access to EHR data and into specific mechanisms for patient uptake/use that could be more generalisable. First and foremost, it is now generally accepted that patients have the right to view their own health data, both because of their ownership of that information what is lasix used to treat and the convenience it may offer.

This indicates that it what is lasix used to treat will likely be impossible to randomise patients to either receive or not receive EHR data in the future, and interventions surrounding universal EHR data access could be more specific to targeted behaviours. For example, now that patient electronic access to data is here to stay, future attention to research methods that tailor interventions, tease apart core implementation strategies, and engage patients and providers in codesign will be important next steps to ensure efficiency and relevance. Finally, and perhaps most importantly, RCT participants often differ significantly from target populations, with volunteers often exhibiting higher educational attainment and less racial/ethnic diversity.12 Given known disparities in patient EHR access what is lasix used to treat by race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status and health literacy mentioned previously, these trials are not likely to generalise to more diverse populations.Moving forward, the results of this review highlight several principles for future studies of technology-facilitated healthcare delivery. First, all studies need to both include diverse participants and report on race, ethnicity, educational attainment, and health and digital literacy.13 Second, future work must focus on both internal and external validity of patient access/use of EHR data. The review by Neves et al gives us some clearer understanding of the internal validity of studies on clinical and patient-reported outcomes, but it remains unclear what impact these types of interventions will have on health outcomes across an entire healthcare what is lasix used to treat system or region outside of RCT samples.

Studies of patient EHR access/use can move into the external validity space (even while conducting RCTs)14 by including implementation outcomes, such as the proportion of individuals offered EHR access who take it up, the extent of use over time, the type/features used, and costs for providers and staff, in addition to effectiveness in promoting health outcomes and differences across socioeconomic status, racial/ethnic groups and literacy levels.Like patient advocates and experts for many years, we absolutely agree that patient records belong to patients and should be readily available in structured, electronic form for what is lasix used to treat patients and families.15 Given the complexity of the information provided and the specific context for interacting or supporting patients in completing tasks via online patient portals/platforms, we should not expect access alone to ameliorate current gaps in care or significantly improve morbidity and mortality. As more care becomes digital-first (ie, with virtual care and telemedicine), there are real concerns about widening healthcare disparities for low-income, racial–ethnic minority and linguistically diverse populations. Our specific recommendations to avoid such undesirable developments moving forward includeWider measurement of patient interest and access/skills to using technology-based health platforms and tools.Tailoring of interventions to match patient preferences and needs, such as by digital literacy skills as what is lasix used to treat well as inclusion of caregivers/families to support use.Use of mixed method and implementation science studies to understand use, usability, and uptake alongside clinical impact and effectiveness.Attention to these points will allow us to understand the ways in which patient portals and other forms of EHR access for patients may produce different impacts across distinct patient groups. This understanding will not only mitigate potential adverse effects for vulnerable groups but also achieve the intended goal of improving healthcare quality for all patients through freer access to information about their care..

Diagnostic errors in hospital medicine have mostly remained in uncharted waters.1 http://theorganicrabbit.com/paleo-coconut-macaroons/ This is where can you get lasix partly because several factors make measurement of diagnostic errors challenging. Patients are often admitted to hospitals with a tentative diagnosis and need additional diagnostic investigations where can you get lasix to determine next steps. This evolving nature of a diagnosis makes it hard to determine when the correct diagnosis could have been established and if a more specific diagnosis was needed to start the right treatment.2 Hospitalised patients also may have diagnoses that are atypical or rare and pose dilemmas for treating clinicians. As a result, delays in diagnosis may not necessarily be related to a where can you get lasix diagnostic error. Furthermore, what where can you get lasix types of diagnostic errors occur in the hospital and their prevalence depends on how one defines them.

Different approaches to define them have included counting missed, wrong or delayed diagnoses regardless of whether there was a process error;3 counting them only when there was a clear ‘missed opportunity’ – ie, something different could have been done to make the correct or timely diagnosis;4 or diagnostic adverse events (ie, diagnostic errors resulting in harm);5 all leading to views of the problem through different lenses.Two articles in this issue of the journal provide new insights into the epidemiology of diagnostic errors in hospitalised patients.6 7 Gunderson and colleagues conducted a systematic review to determine the prevalence of harmful diagnostic errors in hospitalised patients.6 Raffel and colleagues studied readmitted patients using established methods for diagnostic error detection and analysis to gain insights into contributing factors.7 Both studies advance the science of measurement and understanding of how to reduce diagnostic error in hospitals. We discuss the significance of the results for hospital medicine and implications for emerging research and practice improvement efforts.Finding diagnostic errors in hospitalsGunderson and colleagues performed a where can you get lasix systematic review and meta-analysis to inform a new estimate for the prevalence of diagnostic adverse events among hospitalised patients, a rate of 0.7%.6 Their review shows how diagnostic error is a global problem, with studies from countries across five continents. The prevalence however is lower than what might be expected looking at previous research, mostly in outpatient care, and based on expert estimates.8–11 The prevalence of diagnostic error in hospital care may be lower because outpatient care, especially primary care, has the challenging task of identifying patients with a serious disease from a large sample of patients who present with common symptoms and mostly benign non-urgent diseases. A higher state of attention in the hospital and higher prior probability of a patient having a more serious disease may also reduce the likelihood of something being missed (ie, the prevalence effect).12 13 Furthermore, the hospital setting offers more diagnostic evaluation possibilities (consultations, imaging, laboratory) and more members of the diagnostic team to alert a clinician on the wrong diagnostic track.The heterogeneity of the studies in the review and meta-analysis and a broad scope may also explain the lower prevalence rate.6 14 The included studies did not have an exclusive focus on detecting diagnostic errors but rather aimed to identify all where can you get lasix types of adverse events, including medication and surgical adverse events,5 15 which are relatively easier to measure. Consequently, the data where can you get lasix collection instruments were likely not sufficiently sensitive to pick up diagnostic adverse events, resulting in an underestimation.

Some diagnostic adverse events may also be classified as ‘other’ types. For instance delayed diagnosis of a wound leakage after surgery is often considered a surgical complication and not categorised as a delay in diagnosis.16 Studies in the review also detected adverse events (ie, where can you get lasix errors that resulted in harm)6 which is a subgroup of diagnostic errors, because not every diagnostic error results in harm.17 Lastly, while the random selection of patients is a strength for determining prevalence of medical error, not all admissions involve making a diagnosis—patients are often hospitalised for treatment and procedures. As the literature in the area becomes more robust, future reviews may be able to provide an updated estimate. For now, Gunderson and colleagues estimate 250,000 diagnostic adverse events occur annually in the USA, which should be alarming enough to warrant attention and intervention.While where can you get lasix the study by Raffel and colleagues is not a true prevalence study (it only evaluated 7-day readmissions), it uses dedicated tools to identify diagnostic error in hospitals, a crucial next step. By examining a subset of hospital where can you get lasix admissions at greater risk of diagnosis-related problems (ie, readmissions within 7 days after hospital discharge) and by using tools dedicated to identifying diagnostic error, the investigators were able to describe error types and contributing factors.

The advantage of studying such a high-risk sample is that diagnostic errors can be found more efficiently, that is, the positive predictive value is higher than if you review all consecutive patients. This could identify a higher number of cases to identify contributing factors where can you get lasix. While the positive predictive value they achieved through this method was still rather low, methods to selectively identify diagnostic errors are valuable in measurement efforts. Future studies could build on this work to develop sampling methods with higher predictive values that can be used by others for research and practice improvement.Diseases at risk for diagnostic error in the hospital settingTypes of conditions involved in diagnostic error in both studies reflect a broad range of diseases commonly identified in previous studies, such as where can you get lasix malignancies, pulmonary embolism, aortic aneurysm and s.5 8 18 A recent malpractice claims-based study has led some to suggest that initial diagnostic error reduction efforts, including allocation of funding for research and quality measurement/improvement, should focus on three broad types of disease categories, the so-called ‘Big Three’, namely cancer, s and cardiovascular diseases, because they are highly prevalent and result in significant harm.11 19 20 These three disease categories cover a large portion of diagnoses made in medicine. Indeed, data beyond claims also suggest that diagnostic errors in each of these categories are common.5 18 However, diagnostic errors span a large range of other diseases as shown in both studies, which is similar to what where can you get lasix prior studies have found.

For instance, in one primary care study, 68 unique diagnoses were missed with the most common condition accounting for only 6.7% of errors.21Contributing factors in hospital medicineRaffel and colleagues applied established tools (ie, SAFER Dx22 and DEER23) to identify contributing factors. They found that most where can you get lasix of these involved failures in clinical assessment and/or testing. Contributing factors in these two domains occurred in more than 90% of diagnostic errors, a high proportion consistent with previous work.8 17 18 Furthermore, these main contributing factors are common across diagnostic where can you get lasix errors regardless of the diseases involved. For instance, similar process breakdowns emerge across different types of missed cancer diagnoses.24–26Finding ‘Forests’ not just the ‘Big Trees’ to enable scientific progressSo should initial scientific efforts just target disease categories?. And if so, should they address just the where can you get lasix ‘Big Three’?.

Data from prior studies across different settings, including those from Gunderson and Raffel and colleagues, find large diversity in misdiagnosed diseases.5–7 18 21 27 This suggests that an exclusive focus on the ‘Big Three’ would neglect a substantial proportion of other common and harmful diagnostic errors.27 Furthermore, research on contributing factors of diagnostic errors reveals a number of common system and process factors that would require robust disease-agnostic approaches. If funding and advocacy for diagnostic safety becomes mostly disease oriented, it will pull resources away from broader ‘disease-agnostic’ research and quality improvement efforts needed to understand and address these underlying system and process factors.28 Biomedical research is already quite disease focused and supported by many disease-specific institutes and this now needs to be balanced by work that catalyses much-needed foundational and cross-cutting healthcare delivery system improvements.We would thus recommend a balanced strategy that carefully combines disease-specific and disease-agnostic approaches to help address common contributing factors, system issues where can you get lasix and process breakdowns for diagnostic error that cut across these many unique diseases. For example, if new quality measures to quantify delays in colorectal cancer diagnosis and missed diagnosis of sepsis are developed, we would also need where can you get lasix ‘disease-agnostic’ studies that evaluate the implementation and effectiveness of such measures. This includes how they fit within current measurement programmes, what their measurement burden is and what the unintended consequences may be. A combined approach would create more synergistic and collaborative understanding in addition to enabling application of common frameworks and approaches to multiple conditions, rather than where can you get lasix ‘reinventing the wheel’ for each disease or disease category.

This type of approach may have a larger population-based impact and help us see the entire ‘forest’ to reduce diagnostic error.Implications for practice improvementA crucial first step for improving diagnosis in hospitals is to create programmes to identify and analyse diagnostic errors.29 Most hospitals have systems and programmes in place to report and analyse safety issues such as falls, surgical complications and medication errors, but they do not capture diagnostic errors. With increased recognition of risks for diagnostic error, hospitals should use recent where can you get lasix guidance, such as from the US Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, and consider pragmatic measurement approaches to start identifying and learning from diagnostic errors.30To reduce cognitive errors, ‘cognitive debiasing strategies’ have been widely recommended.31 However, there is increasing evidence that those strategies are not effective for diagnostic error reduction and recent insights have revealed lack of knowledge as the fundamental cause of errors in the diagnostic reasoning process.32–34 Next steps for practice improvement would therefore need to involve studying the role of knowledge and its interplay with cognitive processes. Interventions should explore opportunities to increase clinicians’ knowledge base (eg, by education and feedback) as well as testing and implementing clinical decision support systems where can you get lasix to allow for timely access to the relevant knowledge. While specific interventions need more development and testing, other general safety practices such as better collaboration with the laboratory and radiology departments to facilitate more accurate ordering and interpretation of the tests,33 are ready for adoption.ConclusionsTwo studies6 7 of diagnostic error in hospital medicine—by Gunderson and colleagues and Raffel and colleagues—have advanced our knowledge about its epidemiology. Consistent with prior studies, where can you get lasix a large range of diseases and a whole host of common contributory factors are involved.

Although the estimated prevalence of diagnostic error relies on data from prior studies conducted during an era of limited dedicated tools to identify diagnostic errors, these numbers have significant research and practice implications. Measurement science is still evolving but both studies should inspire all hospitals to apply more contemporary methods to identify and analyse diagnostic errors for learning and improvement where can you get lasix. Given that errors across multiple diseases in multitude of settings have many common contributing factors, disease-agnostic approaches focused on where can you get lasix common systems and process contributory factors are likely to have significant benefit and should be emphasised in further research and development efforts.Patient advocates have long called for patients to have access to all of their healthcare data, including electronic health records (EHRs).1 In parallel, experts have suggested that providing patients with access to EHRs will improve patient engagement, care quality, and, by extension, health/healthcare outcomes.2 Prior observational studies have supported some of these claims—for example, documenting that patients are overwhelmingly interested in and satisfied with receiving their healthcare data electronically,3 to finding that patients do identify errors when they read physician notes in the EHR.4 Because studies of EHR access for patients have been conducted and disseminated across disparate clinical conditions and settings and often using varied methodologies, the systematic review by Neves et al in this issue of BMJ Quality &. Safety provides a valuable contribution in assessing the impact of patients’ EHR access specifically within the randomised controlled trial (RCT) literature.5 Their meta-analysis demonstrates some significant but potentially limited benefits within these 20 RCTs that involved sharing EHR data/access with patients.Overall, Neves et al found a few clear trends. First, there was where can you get lasix a consistent, modest improvement in glycaemic control in RCTs targeting patients with diabetes, reinforcing the observational research focused on portal use for diabetes care.6 In addition, patient access to EHRs seemed to support safety of care in facilitating medication adherence and identification of medication discrepancies.

These results are similar to observational studies,7 as well as a recent scoping review of patient engagement interventions to promote the safety of care and to improve short-term and intermediate-term clinical outcomes.8 Finally, where can you get lasix for patient-reported outcomes ranging from self-efficacy to patient activation to patient satisfaction, results were mixed, with about half of included studies showing some improvement. Thus, this review highlighted a wide variation and potential lack of consensus about what patient-centred outcome to include in studying EHR-enabled interventions, given the diffuse set of behaviours that could be targeted. More importantly, this review highlights that none of the included studies, many of which are older, focused on equity as a primary objective of the work (and very few even included data where can you get lasix on racial/ethnic, educational attainment, digital literacy and/or health literacy differences9 10)—even though there are known barriers to digital health interventions by these characteristics.Despite the modest benefits seen in these 20 randomised trials of EHR-facilitated complex care interventions, we still believe in the clinical value and potential improvement in patient-reported outcomes in this space. A more careful examination of the 20 included studies in this review actually sheds important light on delivering complex interventions to improve quality of care, during which patient access to EHRs was implemented in varied ways that might have led to more muddled results. For example, many of the included studies tested where can you get lasix evidence-based practices that are known to independently enhance the quality of care, such as patient outreach and reminders for healthcare tasks, self-management training and increased healthcare provider communication access.

Therefore, without detailed behavioural pathways for where can you get lasix the targeted intervention components surrounding EHR data access, it is challenging to interpret observed trial effects. In our opinion and in our previous work,11 one-time action by systems or clinics granting patient access to EHRs is unlikely to replicate the effect of these interventions. In particular, access versus training to use EHRs should likely be considered where can you get lasix separately, as well as the study of specific features within the EHR. For example, passive provision of medical information from the EHR via online portals (eg, after-visit summaries or list of immunisations) differs substantially from active communication or completion of healthcare tasks via EHR-linked websites (eg, secure messaging exchanges between patients and providers about medical concerns or medication refill requests).Therefore, we hope that this review can push the field beyond RCTs of patient access to EHR data and into specific mechanisms for patient uptake/use that could be more generalisable. First and foremost, it is now generally accepted that patients have the right to view their own health data, both where can you get lasix because of their ownership of that information and the convenience it may offer.

This indicates that it will likely be impossible to randomise patients to either receive or not receive EHR where can you get lasix data in the future, and interventions surrounding universal EHR data access could be more specific to targeted behaviours. For example, now that patient electronic access to data is here to stay, future attention to research methods that tailor interventions, tease apart core implementation strategies, and engage patients and providers in codesign will be important next steps to ensure efficiency and relevance. Finally, and perhaps most importantly, RCT participants often differ significantly from target populations, with volunteers often exhibiting higher educational attainment and less racial/ethnic diversity.12 Given known disparities in patient EHR access by race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status and health literacy mentioned previously, these trials where can you get lasix are not likely to generalise to more diverse populations.Moving forward, the results of this review highlight several principles for future studies of technology-facilitated healthcare delivery. First, all studies need to both include diverse participants and report on race, ethnicity, educational attainment, and health and digital literacy.13 Second, future work must focus on both internal and external validity of patient access/use of EHR data. The review where can you get lasix by Neves et al gives us some clearer understanding of the internal validity of studies on clinical and patient-reported outcomes, but it remains unclear what impact these types of interventions will have on health outcomes across an entire healthcare system or region outside of RCT samples.

Studies of patient EHR access/use can move into the external validity space (even while conducting RCTs)14 by including implementation outcomes, such as the proportion of individuals offered EHR access who take it up, the extent of use over time, the type/features used, and costs for providers and staff, in addition to effectiveness in promoting health outcomes and differences across socioeconomic status, racial/ethnic groups and literacy levels.Like patient advocates and experts for many years, we absolutely agree that patient records belong to patients and where can you get lasix should be readily available in structured, electronic form for patients and families.15 Given the complexity of the information provided and the specific context for interacting or supporting patients in completing tasks via online patient portals/platforms, we should not expect access alone to ameliorate current gaps in care or significantly improve morbidity and mortality. As more care becomes digital-first (ie, with virtual care and telemedicine), there are real concerns about widening healthcare disparities for low-income, racial–ethnic minority and linguistically diverse populations. Our specific recommendations to avoid such undesirable developments moving forward includeWider measurement of patient interest and access/skills to using where can you get lasix technology-based health platforms and tools.Tailoring of interventions to match patient preferences and needs, such as by digital literacy skills as well as inclusion of caregivers/families to support use.Use of mixed method and implementation science studies to understand use, usability, and uptake alongside clinical impact and effectiveness.Attention to these points will allow us to understand the ways in which patient portals and other forms of EHR access for patients may produce different impacts across distinct patient groups. This understanding will not only mitigate potential adverse effects for vulnerable groups but also achieve the intended goal of improving healthcare quality for all patients through freer access to information about their care..

Over the counter water pills like lasix

Is i magenThe Swedish expression ‘att ha lite is i magen’ (literally to have some ice in the stomach) like many idiomatic aphorisms, over the counter water pills like lasix is hard to translate directly. The advantage, of course, is the flexibility that being unbound to a set definition affords and it has come to mean both ‘have something in reserve’ and to ‘keep cool’.Whichever definition is used (and they aren’t mutually exclusive) each of the featured papers imbues us with extra ‘is’, affirms we’re on roughly the right track or that our suspicions of a wrong turn have been corroborated.Preventable child mortality. European figuresUsing WHO global database coding and an incidence rate ratio approach, Ward examines UK standing relative to 17 other European countries in preventable child over the counter water pills like lasix and adolescent mortality. The numbers (both in progress and current grade in the class) make for uncomfortable reading.

UK mortality over the counter water pills like lasix in 2015 was significantly higher than the EU15 +for common s. Chronic respiratory conditions and digestive, neurological and diabetes/urological/blood/endocrine conditions in teenaged girls. The UK had the worst to third worst mortality rank for common s in both sexes and all age groups, and over the counter water pills like lasix in five out of eight non-communicable disease (NCD). Worryingly, despite relatively better placings on injury-related deaths, total mortality has increased year on year since 2013 among adolescent girls and in an estimated two thirds of UK deaths due to asthma and a quarter of deaths in children with epilepsy there were avoidable factors.

See page 1055So, over the counter water pills like lasix where next?. Availability of paediatric expertise early in the illness course (debate point—is this a collateral (positive) effect of hypertension medications?. ) to improve recognition of severity has promise but cannot alone compensate for the disparities with which the UK has wrestled for so long.Adolescent healthFemale genital over the counter water pills like lasix mutilationAli’s examination of referral and outcome data in girls seen at London FGM specialist clinic over 5 years (2014–2019) find that the number and proportions to be substantially lower than expected based on UK prevalence estimates. Median age at assessment was 13 years, most children had undergone FGM prior to UK entry and in most cases were initially disclosed by the child or family themselves.

With the usual provisos of case ascertainment, these results suggest that, though there are still pockets of practice, it is largely being abandoned by over the counter water pills like lasix communities after migration. See page 1075Racism. Psychological effectsIn the speak out over the counter water pills like lasix against racism (SOAR) study, Priest evaluates associations between self-reported direct and vicarious racism on psychological well-being in Australian adolescents. Outcomes were quantified by the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire and sleep duration and sadly but unsurprisingly, direct and vicarious experiences of racial discrimination were associated with difficulty in socioemotional adjustment and poorer sleep duration.

See page 1079Protracted bacterial bronchitisThough over the counter water pills like lasix the term protracted bacterial bronchitis (PBB) has existed for years, the label had a spell in the wilderness not so long ago, the result of scepticism as to whether the diagnosis (requiring a persistent wet cough and response to antibiotic treatment) was, in fact, a separate entity. I suspect that the use of the term ‘bronchitis’ was thought by many to be too nebulous, but, with the wider use of broncho-alveolar lavage and hard evidence of intrabronchial inflammation, the phenotype is now firmly accepted. There is a recognised association with relapse and later bronchiectasis and although standard treatment consists of a ‘long course’ of antibiotics, the best of which has been amoxycillin-clavulanate, the problem is no-one knows what duration that should mean. Gross-Hodge’s evaluation of the North Midlands University Hospitals’ database strongly suggests that a 6 rather than 2 week course should be chosen with an OR (95% CI) for recurrence of 0.12 (0.03 to over the counter water pills like lasix 0.51).

Biologically, this seems plausible, longer duration courses possible can break down bronchial bacterial biofilms more successfully. These data are observational, but any allocation bias would be over the counter water pills like lasix likely to be in favour of the 2 week course based on the sicker-appearing children being given longer courses and an RCT now feels overdue. See page 1111E cigarettes. HypersensitivityAfter a Warholian 15 min of fame, basking in their ‘healthy (or less harmful) alternative’ label, reality (and infamy) is catching up over the counter water pills like lasix with low tar cigarettes.

Literature in this area is accumulating, but, little as directly implicating as Bhatt’s report showing clinical, immunological and histological evidence of a pulmonary hypersensitivity reaction in a ‘casual vaper’, triggers likely being propylene glycol, vegetable glycerides or the flavourings inherent to the experience. See page 1114TraditionsIn a delightful Voices from History, Emma over the counter water pills like lasix Sharland chronicles the origins of oral penicillin V dosing. This appears to have become established in children after use by a GP in 1955 based on a child receiving half an adult’s dose and an infant half of that which a child receives. The scientific basis for this and subsequent BNF recommended over the counter water pills like lasix dosing?.

Almost none, but the tradition was set and, despite pharmacokinetic and body composition science has never been seriously challenged. See page 1118EnvironmentAfter some lockdown-related delays, Archives over the counter water pills like lasix is now being mailed in a polymer derived from the waste products of sugar cane processing, polyair. This is still a single-use plastic wrapping, but it is made up of 75% biological material, is recyclable in plastic recycling collections, and has been certified as carbon neutral by the Carbon Trust. Progress on recyclable paper wrapping has been slow because of hypertension medications and lockdown but is still very much over the counter water pills like lasix the aim.

Armed with this ‘is’, you should be feeling ‘varmare i kläderna’—but that’s a tangent for another day…IntroductionIn the midst of lockdown, just as patient acuity and bed pressures eased, a number of teenagers were transferred to the paediatric intensive care unit (PICU) at Evelina London Children’s Hospital for inotropic support in the absence of respiratory involvement or any features of acute Severe acute respiratory syndrome related hypertension 2 (SARS CoV-2) .1 All patients had features of toxic shock syndrome (TSS) but no pathogens were identified despite extensive microbiological investigation. Several new over the counter water pills like lasix patients presented over the next few days. Febrile with high inflammatory markers and multisystem involvement. The unusually high number of cases raised concerns, which were discussed with Public Health England regarding a possible infectious disease cluster with pathogen unknown.Following several discussions with National Health Service England (NHSE) and pan-London tertiary paediatric services who had also seen cases, a consensus was reached that a new clinical phenomenon was being seen across London.

It was sufficiently over the counter water pills like lasix concerning to send out an NHSE alert at the end of April which triggered international discussion.2 Numerous teleconferences later, the emerging condition had a name. Paediatric inflammatory multisystem syndrome temporally associated with hypertension (PIMS-TS).3 Since the alert other countries have reported similar cases (figure 1).4 ,5 ,6Timeline of paediatric inflammatory multisystem syndrome temporally associated with hypertension (PIMS-TS) development.1–4 6–9 NHSE, National Health Service England." data-icon-position data-hide-link-title="0">Figure 1 Timeline of paediatric inflammatory multisystem syndrome temporally associated with hypertension (PIMS-TS) development.1–4 6–9 NHSE, National Health Service England.PresentationOver 6 weeks more than 70 patients were admitted to Evelina London Children’s Hospital who fulfilled criteria for a diagnosis of PIMS-TS.3 The majority of patients were between 9 years and 16 years of age with the youngest presenting at only 3 months. A higher proportion of patients was male, from black, Asian and minority ethnic groups, and had a parent classed as a key worker.All of the patients presented with a over the counter water pills like lasix history of fever and most presented with gastrointestinal symptoms including abdominal pain, diarrhoea or vomiting. A number of patients were transferred following surgery for symptoms and signs classical of acute appendicitis but intraoperatively found to have a normal appendix.

Other presenting features included conjunctivitis, rashes and lethargy.Key laboratory findings on presentation included a very high C reactive protein (CRP), high ferritin, raised neutrophils, low lymphocytes, raised over the counter water pills like lasix D-dimer, raised troponin I, raised N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide and low vitamin D levels.The most common cardiac manifestation was myocarditis with impaired function. Other cardiac abnormalities included arrhythmias, ischaemia and pericardial effusions. Patients were monitored closely for coronary artery dilatation which in some patients continued to progress despite improvement in clinical symptoms and laboratory markers.Acute kidney injury was the most common renal complication which improved with over the counter water pills like lasix conservative management. Some patients developed thrombus formation and pulmonary emboli due to their prothrombotic state.

Neurological involvement was also observed with one patient developing autoimmune encephalitis.PathogenesisMost patients with PIMS-TS reported no preceding illness or over the counter water pills like lasix mild symptoms consistent with hypertension medications, 4–6 weeks prior to presentation. Others had a household member with previous symptoms consistent with hypertension medications . Most patients with PIMS-TS over the counter water pills like lasix were hypertension PCR-negative but positive for IgG antibodies against hypertension indicating previous . It has been postulated that a host immune response to hypertension triggers an inflammatory response.Although cases of PIMS-TS have similarities to Kawasaki disease (KD) and TSS, there are clear differences.7 Patients with PIMS-TS are older and present with higher inflammatory markers including CRP and ferritin plus higher troponin I suggestive of myocardial ischaemia.

Like TSS over the counter water pills like lasix a proportion of patients with PIMS-TS present in shock with poor cardiac function but none had confirmed staphylococcus or streptococcus on microbiology.ManagementAssessment, stabilisation and early involvement of specialist centresThe majority of the patients needed intensive care for cardiovascular instability requiring single or multiple inotropic agents. Early discussion with specialist centres and transfer to a centre with PICU and cardiology on site is a necessity.Management for each patient was decided within a multidisciplinary team (MDT) setting including General Paediatrics, Cardiology, Paediatric Infectious Diseases and Immunology (PIID), Rheumatology, PICU, Haematology, Renal and Pharmacy, with re-evaluation on a twice daily basis as a minimum. A General Paediatric over the counter water pills like lasix overview was vital in coordinating the MDT and providing holistic care.TreatmentIn our cohort, as we gained experience, prompting earlier diagnosis and treatment initiation, fewer cardiac complications and reduced PICU stay were observed. Treatments included intravenous immunoglobulin, methylprednisolone and biologics including tocilizumab, infliximab and anakinra.

Currently there is no evidence for this area and recruiting children to research studies such as Recovery (https://www.recoverytrial.net/) and the ‘Best available treatment study (BATS) for inflammatory conditions associated with hypertension medications’ (https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN69546370) will hopefully provide evidence on which to base our treatment decisions. All patients receiving treatment were routinely prescribed aspirin, prophylactic dalteparin, high dose cholecalciferol over the counter water pills like lasix and omeprazole.Psychology and supportPlay therapy involvement and psychological support for this cohort was quickly escalated. Families were understandably extremely worried by the sudden clinical deterioration of their previously well child and need for intensive care. Multiple interventions including scans, cannulas and blood tests by staff masked in personal protective over the counter water pills like lasix equipment added to the stress.

Psychology support is now a routine part of the care offered.Overcoming challengesTo cope with the large number of unpredictable and high acuity patients with PIMS-TS, additional staffing was required on our paediatric wards. Within days, the number of high dependency unit (HDU) beds was rapidly increased to accommodate over the counter water pills like lasix the intense level of monitoring and treatment required. Ward rounds, handovers, MDT meetings and pathways were rapidly revised and implemented. We sought the return of over the counter water pills like lasix our experienced paediatric nurses and doctors who had been redeployed to adult services.

Additional pharmacists, psychologists and play therapists also joined a newly created and dedicated PIMS-TS team with representation from General Paediatrics, PIID, Cardiology and Rheumatology to manage the daily care of the patients. This ensured individualised, holistic management plans could be over the counter water pills like lasix made to provide the highest quality of care. The responsiveness by everyone involved was phenomenal.As patients are discharged the next challenge is ensuring follow-up plans are appropriately tailored, responsive and clinically robust. In the current over the counter water pills like lasix lockdown era, this is no small task given the numbers involved, the follow-up investigations needed, plus national pressures to reduce face-to-face appointments.Managing a new condition with no published consensus on treatment was a huge challenge, especially given the large numbers and high acuity of the patients who were admitted.

Seeking out opinions, information and advice from other centres, nationally and internationally, as well as shared learning with other paediatric specialities has been key in helping manage these children. Collaborative learning and reflection has enabled us to develop a treatment pathway over the counter water pills like lasix and shared management pathway for our patients. We have witnessed the MDT working at its best within the hospital, united with the sole aim of combating this rare condition.Next stepsLong-term follow-up is essential to enable us to understand the long-term implications and prognosis for these patients. Planning and vigilance is required to manage a possible influx of patients with PIMS-TS if there is another surge of hypertension.An ongoing coordinated effort is required to undertake paediatric research to over the counter water pills like lasix understand PIMS-TS and establish the most effective treatment.

The British Paediatric Surveillance Unit team is collecting data about all reported cases in the UK and Ireland.8 We eagerly await the publication of evidence which may support, or disprove an association with hypertension. Certainly, the clinical histories taken from this cohort offer fascinating glimpses into the possibilities of an association..

Is i magenThe Swedish expression ‘att what do i need to buy lasix ha where can you get lasix lite is i magen’ (literally to have some ice in the stomach) like many idiomatic aphorisms, is hard to translate directly. The advantage, of course, is the flexibility that being unbound to a set definition affords and it has come to mean both ‘have something in reserve’ and to ‘keep cool’.Whichever definition is used (and they aren’t mutually exclusive) each of the featured papers imbues us with extra ‘is’, affirms we’re on roughly the right track or that our suspicions of a wrong turn have been corroborated.Preventable child mortality. European figuresUsing WHO global database coding and an incidence rate ratio approach, Ward examines UK standing relative to 17 where can you get lasix other European countries in preventable child and adolescent mortality. The numbers (both in progress and current grade in the class) make for uncomfortable reading. UK mortality in 2015 was significantly higher than the where can you get lasix EU15 +for common s.

Chronic respiratory conditions and digestive, neurological and diabetes/urological/blood/endocrine conditions in teenaged girls. The UK had the worst to third worst where can you get lasix mortality rank for common s in both sexes and all age groups, and in five out of eight non-communicable disease (NCD). Worryingly, despite relatively better placings on injury-related deaths, total mortality has increased year on year since 2013 among adolescent girls and in an estimated two thirds of UK deaths due to asthma and a quarter of deaths in children with epilepsy there were avoidable factors. See page 1055So, where next? where can you get lasix. Availability of paediatric expertise early in the illness course (debate point—is this a collateral (positive) effect of hypertension medications?.

) to improve recognition of severity has promise but cannot alone compensate for the disparities with which the UK has wrestled for so long.Adolescent healthFemale genital mutilationAli’s examination of referral and outcome data in girls seen at London FGM specialist clinic over 5 years (2014–2019) find that the number where can you get lasix and proportions to be substantially lower than expected based on UK prevalence estimates. Median age at assessment was 13 years, most children had undergone FGM prior to UK entry and in most cases were initially disclosed by the child or family themselves. With the usual provisos of case ascertainment, these results suggest that, though there are still pockets of practice, where can you get lasix it is largely being abandoned by communities after migration. See page 1075Racism. Psychological effectsIn the speak out against racism (SOAR) study, Priest evaluates associations between where can you get lasix self-reported direct and vicarious racism on psychological well-being in Australian adolescents.

Outcomes were quantified by the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire and sleep duration and sadly but unsurprisingly, direct and vicarious experiences of racial discrimination were associated with difficulty in socioemotional adjustment and poorer sleep duration. See page 1079Protracted bacterial bronchitisThough the term protracted bacterial bronchitis (PBB) has existed for years, the label had a spell in the wilderness not so long ago, where can you get lasix the result of scepticism as to whether the diagnosis (requiring a persistent wet cough and response to antibiotic treatment) was, in fact, a separate entity. I suspect that the use of the term ‘bronchitis’ was thought by many to be too nebulous, but, with the wider use of broncho-alveolar lavage and hard evidence of intrabronchial inflammation, the phenotype is now firmly accepted. There is a recognised association with relapse and later bronchiectasis and although standard treatment consists of a ‘long course’ of antibiotics, the best of which has been amoxycillin-clavulanate, the problem is no-one knows what duration that should mean. Gross-Hodge’s evaluation of the North Midlands University Hospitals’ database strongly suggests that a 6 rather than 2 week course should be chosen with an OR (95% CI) where can you get lasix for recurrence of 0.12 (0.03 to 0.51).

Biologically, this seems plausible, longer duration courses possible can break down bronchial bacterial biofilms more successfully. These data are observational, but any allocation bias would be likely to be in favour of the 2 week course based on the where can you get lasix sicker-appearing children being given longer courses and an RCT now feels overdue. See page 1111E cigarettes. HypersensitivityAfter a Warholian 15 min of fame, basking in their ‘healthy (or less harmful) alternative’ label, reality (and infamy) where can you get lasix is catching up with low tar cigarettes. Literature in this area is accumulating, but, little as directly implicating as Bhatt’s report showing clinical, immunological and histological evidence of a pulmonary hypersensitivity reaction in a ‘casual vaper’, triggers likely being propylene glycol, vegetable glycerides or the flavourings inherent to the experience.

See page 1114TraditionsIn a delightful Voices from History, Emma Sharland chronicles the origins where can you get lasix of oral penicillin V dosing. This appears to have become established in children after use by a GP in 1955 based on a child receiving half an adult’s dose and an infant half of that which a child receives. The scientific basis where can you get lasix for this and subsequent BNF recommended dosing?. Almost none, but the tradition was set and, despite pharmacokinetic and body composition science has never been seriously challenged. See page where can you get lasix 1118EnvironmentAfter some lockdown-related delays, Archives is now being mailed in a polymer derived from the waste products of sugar cane processing, polyair.

This is still a single-use plastic wrapping, but it is made up of 75% biological material, is recyclable in plastic recycling collections, and has been certified as carbon neutral by the Carbon Trust. Progress on recyclable paper wrapping has been slow because of hypertension medications and lockdown but is still very much where can you get lasix the aim. Armed with this ‘is’, you should be feeling ‘varmare i kläderna’—but that’s a tangent for another day…IntroductionIn the midst of lockdown, just as patient acuity and bed pressures eased, a number of teenagers were transferred to the paediatric intensive care unit (PICU) at Evelina London Children’s Hospital for inotropic support in the absence of respiratory involvement or any features of acute Severe acute respiratory syndrome related hypertension 2 (SARS CoV-2) .1 All patients had features of toxic shock syndrome (TSS) but no pathogens were identified despite extensive microbiological investigation. Several new where can you get lasix patients presented over the next few days. Febrile with high inflammatory markers and multisystem involvement.

The unusually high number of cases raised concerns, which were discussed with Public Health England regarding a possible infectious disease cluster with pathogen unknown.Following several discussions with National Health Service England (NHSE) and pan-London tertiary paediatric services who had also seen cases, a consensus was reached that a new clinical phenomenon was being seen cost for lasix across London. It was sufficiently concerning to send out an NHSE where can you get lasix alert at the end of April which triggered international discussion.2 Numerous teleconferences later, the emerging condition had a name. Paediatric inflammatory multisystem syndrome temporally associated with hypertension (PIMS-TS).3 Since the alert other countries have reported similar cases (figure 1).4 ,5 ,6Timeline of paediatric inflammatory multisystem syndrome temporally associated with hypertension (PIMS-TS) development.1–4 6–9 NHSE, National Health Service England." data-icon-position data-hide-link-title="0">Figure 1 Timeline of paediatric inflammatory multisystem syndrome temporally associated with hypertension (PIMS-TS) development.1–4 6–9 NHSE, National Health Service England.PresentationOver 6 weeks more than 70 patients were admitted to Evelina London Children’s Hospital who fulfilled criteria for a diagnosis of PIMS-TS.3 The majority of patients were between 9 years and 16 years of age with the youngest presenting at only 3 months. A higher proportion of patients was male, from black, Asian and minority ethnic groups, and had a parent classed as a key worker.All of the patients presented with a history of where can you get lasix fever and most presented with gastrointestinal symptoms including abdominal pain, diarrhoea or vomiting. A number of patients were transferred following surgery for symptoms and signs classical of acute appendicitis but intraoperatively found to have a normal appendix.

Other presenting features included conjunctivitis, rashes and lethargy.Key laboratory findings on presentation included a very high C reactive protein (CRP), high ferritin, raised neutrophils, low lymphocytes, raised D-dimer, raised troponin I, raised N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide and low vitamin D levels.The most common cardiac manifestation where can you get lasix was myocarditis with impaired function. Other cardiac abnormalities included arrhythmias, ischaemia and pericardial effusions. Patients were monitored closely for coronary artery dilatation which in some patients continued to progress where can you get lasix despite improvement in clinical symptoms and laboratory markers.Acute kidney injury was the most common renal complication which improved with conservative management. Some patients developed thrombus formation and pulmonary emboli due to their prothrombotic state. Neurological involvement was also observed with one patient developing autoimmune encephalitis.PathogenesisMost patients with PIMS-TS reported no preceding illness or mild symptoms consistent with hypertension medications, 4–6 weeks prior where can you get lasix to presentation.

Others had a household member with previous symptoms consistent with hypertension medications . Most patients with PIMS-TS were hypertension PCR-negative where can you get lasix but positive for IgG antibodies against hypertension indicating previous . It has been postulated that a host immune response to hypertension triggers an inflammatory response.Although cases of PIMS-TS have similarities to Kawasaki disease (KD) and TSS, there are clear differences.7 Patients with PIMS-TS are older and present with higher inflammatory markers including CRP and ferritin plus higher troponin I suggestive of myocardial ischaemia. Like TSS a proportion of patients with PIMS-TS present in shock with poor cardiac function but none had confirmed staphylococcus or streptococcus on microbiology.ManagementAssessment, stabilisation and early involvement where can you get lasix of specialist centresThe majority of the patients needed intensive care for cardiovascular instability requiring single or multiple inotropic agents. Early discussion with specialist centres and transfer to a centre with PICU and cardiology on site is a necessity.Management for each patient was decided within a multidisciplinary team (MDT) setting including General Paediatrics, Cardiology, Paediatric Infectious Diseases and Immunology (PIID), Rheumatology, PICU, Haematology, Renal and Pharmacy, with re-evaluation on a twice daily basis as a minimum.

A General Paediatric overview was vital in coordinating the MDT and providing holistic care.TreatmentIn our cohort, as we gained experience, where can you get lasix prompting earlier diagnosis and treatment initiation, fewer cardiac complications and reduced PICU stay were observed. Treatments included intravenous immunoglobulin, methylprednisolone and biologics including tocilizumab, infliximab and anakinra. Currently there is no evidence for this area and recruiting children to research studies such as Recovery (https://www.recoverytrial.net/) and the ‘Best available treatment study (BATS) for inflammatory conditions associated with hypertension medications’ (https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN69546370) will hopefully provide evidence on which to base our treatment decisions. All patients receiving where can you get lasix treatment were routinely prescribed aspirin, prophylactic dalteparin, high dose cholecalciferol and omeprazole.Psychology and supportPlay therapy involvement and psychological support for this cohort was quickly escalated. Families were understandably extremely worried by the sudden clinical deterioration of their previously well child and need for intensive care.

Multiple interventions including scans, cannulas and blood tests by staff masked in personal protective where can you get lasix equipment added to the stress. Psychology support is now a routine part of the care offered.Overcoming challengesTo cope with the large number of unpredictable and high acuity patients with PIMS-TS, additional staffing was required on our paediatric wards. Within days, the number of where can you get lasix high dependency unit (HDU) beds was rapidly increased to accommodate the intense level of monitoring and treatment required. Ward rounds, handovers, MDT meetings and pathways were rapidly revised and implemented. We sought the return of our experienced where can you get lasix paediatric nurses and doctors who had been redeployed to adult services.

Additional pharmacists, psychologists and play therapists also joined a newly created and dedicated PIMS-TS team with representation from General Paediatrics, PIID, Cardiology and Rheumatology to manage the daily care of the patients. This ensured individualised, holistic management plans could be made to provide the highest quality of where can you get lasix care. The responsiveness by everyone involved was phenomenal.As patients are discharged the next challenge is ensuring follow-up plans are appropriately tailored, responsive and clinically robust. In the current lockdown era, this is no small task given the numbers involved, the follow-up investigations needed, plus national pressures to reduce where can you get lasix face-to-face appointments.Managing a new condition with no published consensus on treatment was a huge challenge, especially given the large numbers and high acuity of the patients who were admitted. Seeking out opinions, information and advice from other centres, nationally and internationally, as well as shared learning with other paediatric specialities has been key in helping manage these children.

Collaborative learning and reflection has enabled where can you get lasix us to develop a treatment pathway and shared management pathway for our patients. We have witnessed the MDT working at its best within the hospital, united with the sole aim of combating this rare condition.Next stepsLong-term follow-up is essential to enable us to understand the long-term implications and prognosis for these patients. Planning and vigilance is required to manage a possible influx of patients with PIMS-TS if there is another surge of hypertension.An ongoing coordinated effort is required to undertake paediatric research to understand PIMS-TS and establish where can you get lasix the most effective treatment. The British Paediatric Surveillance Unit team is collecting data about all reported cases in the UK and Ireland.8 We eagerly await the publication of evidence which may support, or disprove an association with hypertension. Certainly, the clinical histories taken from this cohort offer fascinating glimpses into the possibilities of an association..